How AI generates text, the data it uses, and the complex issues surrounding objectivity and bias.

How AI generates text, the data it uses, and the complex issues surrounding objectivity and bias.

HOW AI WRITES: A LOOK UNDER THE HOOD

When an AI, specifically a large language model (LLM), writes a blog post, it's not "thinking" in the human sense. Instead, it's performing a sophisticated act of pattern recognition and prediction. The process begins with a massive dataset of text and code from the internet, books, and other sources (IBM). This data is used to train the model to recognize the statistical relationships between words and phrases.

Here's a simplified breakdown of the process:

  1. Tokenization: The AI breaks down the initial prompt or question into smaller units called tokens, which can be words, parts of words, or even individual characters (IBM).

  2. Prediction: The model then calculates the probability of what the next token should be based on the patterns it learned during training. It's essentially asking, "Given the preceding sequence of tokens, what is the most statistically likely token to come next?"

  3. Generation: The AI generates the most probable token and adds it to the sequence. This process is repeated, with the model continuously predicting the next token until it determines the response is complete.

Newer AI models can also incorporate real-time web searches to supplement their responses, a technique known as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). This allows them to provide more current information and often include citations (MOBroadband.org).

THE DATA BEHIND THE WORDS: WHERE IT COMES FROM

The knowledge base of an LLM is a vast collection of text and code from a wide array of public sources. This includes:

  • The Internet: A significant portion of the training data is scraped from the public web, encompassing everything from news articles and encyclopedias to forums and social media.

  • Books: Large digital libraries of books provide the AI with a deep well of grammar, narrative structures, and factual information.

  • Code: Publicly available code repositories help the model understand programming languages and logic.

It's important to understand that the AI's "knowledge" is a static snapshot of the data it was trained on. While some models can now access real-time information through search engines, their foundational understanding is based on this initial training data.

THE QUEST FOR HONESTY AND UNBIASED RESPONSES

Ensuring factual accuracy and mitigating bias in AI is a significant and ongoing challenge. There isn't a single "feature" that guarantees honesty, but rather a multi-faceted approach:

  • Diverse and High-Quality Training Data: The more representative and balanced the training data, the less likely the model is to perpetuate stereotypes or inaccuracies (DigitalOcean).

  • Human-in-the-Loop (HITL): Human reviewers play a crucial role in the fine-tuning process. They provide feedback on the AI's responses, helping to correct factual errors and reduce biased outputs (Thomson Reuters).

  • Algorithmic Fairness Techniques: Researchers are developing methods to identify and mitigate bias within the model's algorithms themselves (DigitalOcean).

  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): By grounding responses in real-time information from reputable sources, RAG can help to reduce the chances of the AI "hallucinating" or making up information (Thomson Reuters).

However, it's crucial to recognize that complete objectivity is an elusive goal.

WHO DECIDES WHAT IS TRUE AND VALID?

This is one of the most complex and contentious issues in AI development. Ultimately, the "truth" an AI presents is a reflection of the data it was trained on and the values of the people who created it.

Here's a breakdown of the key players and influences:

  • The Data: The vast and varied information from the internet inherently contains a multitude of perspectives, biases, and factual inaccuracies. The AI learns from all of it.

  • The Developers: The engineers and researchers who build and train the AI make crucial decisions about what data to include, what to filter out, and how to fine-tune the model's responses. Their own biases, both conscious and unconscious, can influence these decisions (SAP).

  • Human Raters: The individuals who provide feedback on the AI's outputs are guided by a set of rating guidelines. These guidelines are developed by the AI company and reflect their policies on what constitutes a helpful, harmless, and unbiased response.

  • Societal Norms and Values: The broader cultural context in which the AI is developed also plays a role in shaping its understanding of what is considered acceptable and appropriate.

THE SLANT: WHY AI CAN APPEAR POLITICALLY BIASED

The perception of political bias in AI is a valid concern and a complex issue with multiple contributing factors. Your experience of an AI seemingly protecting one political party is not uncommon and can be attributed to several factors:

  • Training Data Imbalance: If the training data contains more content from one political perspective than another, the AI may be more likely to generate responses that align with the more prevalent viewpoint (Chapman University).

  • Safety and Neutrality Guardrails: In an effort to avoid generating harmful or offensive content, AI models are often programmed with "guardrails" that can lead them to be overly cautious when discussing sensitive political topics. This can manifest as a refusal to take a definitive stance or a tendency to provide generic, non-committal answers.

  • The Subjectivity of Neutrality: What one person considers a neutral and unbiased statement, another may perceive as biased. This is particularly true in highly polarized political landscapes. Researchers at Stanford University have found that achieving true political neutrality in AI is "theoretically and practically impossible" (Stanford HAI).

  • Implicit Bias of Developers: The individuals who design and train the AI can inadvertently introduce their own political biases into the system through the choices they make about data and fine-tuning (SAP).

  • Over-correction for Perceived Bias: In some cases, in an attempt to appear neutral, an AI might overcompensate and avoid any statement that could be interpreted as critical of a particular group or ideology, even when such criticism might be factually warranted.

A study from the University of Washington found that interacting with biased AI chatbots could sway people's political views, highlighting the significant influence these models can have (UW News).

In conclusion, the "thinking process" of an AI is a complex interplay of statistical analysis of its training data and the guardrails put in place by its developers. The perception of a political slant is often a result of the inherent biases in the data, the difficulty of achieving true neutrality, and the safety mechanisms designed to prevent the generation of harmful content. The individuals and teams behind the AI are constantly grappling with these challenges in an effort to create models that are both helpful and responsible.

Popular posts from this blog

The Digital Fortress: AI, Cyber War, and America's True Capabilities

  The Digital Fortress: AI, Cyber War, and America's True Capabilities We live in a world governed by invisible connections. We also hear the "alphabet soup" of agencies tasked with managing and protecting them: the NSA, CIA, DIA , and commands buried deep in mountains like Cheyenne . It’s natural to wonder what all this power is for, how secure we really are, and who is really in control. Let's break down the realities of America's digital power , the constant cyber battles, and the hard truths about our vulnerabilities. The "Alphabet Soup" and What They Actually Do When people mention the NSA, CIA, DIA, Pentagon, and Space Command, they're talking about a vast, coordinated national security apparatus . These aren't just spy agencies; they are centers of data collection, analysis, and defense. • NSA (National Security Agency): This is the nation's premier signals intelligence (SIGINT) agency. It has a dual mission:    1. Offense (Spy...
Read more

UAP Whistleblower Testimonies

 # Report on Recent U.S. Congressional Hearings: Whistleblower Testimonies on UAP Crash Retrievals and Storage Controversies ## Executive Summary In recent years, particularly from 2023 to 2025, the U.S. Congress has held multiple hearings on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), formerly known as UFOs. These sessions, convened by the House Oversight and Accountability Committee and related task forces, featured whistleblowers testifying under oath about alleged U.S. government programs involving the recovery of non-human spacecraft and "non-human biologics" (biological remains) from crash sites. Key figures like David Grusch , Luis Elizondo , and investigative journalist George Knapp have claimed the existence of multi-decade crash retrieval and reverse-engineering efforts operating outside standard oversight. While no physical evidence has been publicly presented, testimonies describe intact craft, advanced materials, and biologics recovered from numerous incidents dati...
Read more

From Pittsburgh Porches to Pixelated Worlds: Growing Up in the '50s and '60s, and How the World Sped Up

  From Pittsburgh Porches to Pixelated Worlds: Growing Up in the '50s and '60s, and How the World Sped Up Hey there, fellow time travelers! If you're like me—someone who grew up in the rolling hills of western Pennsylvania during the 1950s and 1960s—you probably remember those lazy summer evenings on the front porch, the faint hum of a black-and-white TV flickering through the screen door, and the electric buzz of a world on the cusp of something massive. We were kids in an era where the Beatles blasted from transistor radios, NASA's rockets pierced the sky like silver arrows, and television wasn't just entertainment—it was a portal to the impossible. Picture this: It's 1969, and the whole neighborhood crammed into our living room to watch Neil Armstrong take that "one small step" on the moon. Or those Saturday nights glued to Chiller Theater with Chilly Billy Cardille, jumping at every creak in the old house. We laughed at the slapstick antics of t...
Read more